- Capacity & Forgetting Rates
- Sensory memory
- Relatively large capacity
- Immediate decay
- STM
- 7 or so chunkcs
- ~30 seconds or longer
- LTM
- Infinite?
- Lifetime?
- Geneology
- Ebbinghaus (1885)
- He was an introspectionist
- Served as his own subject
- Had someone come up with a list of nonsense, one syllable words.
- He would study them then test himself at different time intervals (immediately, a few hours later, a few days later, etc.)
- He found that his memory would have a very rapid decay rate but then would bottom out
- The difference between one week and four weeks was very negligible
- This became known as the Ebbinghaus Forgetting Curve
- Following this curved seemed to suggest that forgetting is really just decay
- This raised a problem...
- McGoech (1932): Time itself doesn't cause anything, it is the processes occurring in that time that make things happen.
- So what is the process that is going on during this decay period
- Decay
- What process is causing decay?
- Thinking
- We are constantly thinking about other things and this overlap can cause some interference
- Sleep
- Sometimes we sleep which would create a time gap for decay
- If it is just decay then have the same time lapse between a person being awake and a person being asleep then people would have the same rate of decay in either situation
- What they actually found is that people remember better when they sleep as opposed to when they are awake with normal daily activities.
- Sleep seems to help with consolidation
- Consolidation
- Takes memories from a malleable state and makes it fairly impervious (LTM)
- Systems Consolidation
- Going from hippocampal dependent to hippocampal independent
- Ribot's Law
- Found that the older a memory is the more impervious it is to forgetting from brain damage
- a.k.a. "last in, first out" or "first in, last out" principle
- Why do we forget?
- Decay
- Occlusion
- Example: remembering your old phone number now that you have a new one can be very difficult
- Tip-of-the-tongue phenomenon
- This is where you feel like you remember but it's just on the tip-of-your-tongue. This could be what is happening but most of the time it is not
- Unlearning
- Not a very big difference between this and occlusion
- Works for recall, not for recognition
- Interference
- This accounts for most forgetting
- AB-AC design
- This is where you have two lists of word pairs and the second pairs have one of the same words from the first pairs but paired with a novel word. Usually the second list will cause interference on the recall of the first list
- This type of interference is quite bad when it comes to two word lists but if you have one word list and the next the pairing is with a picture then memory interference is much less.
- Muller & Pilzecker (1900)
- The best time to study is right before you sleep or before you drink alcohol
- Why does timing matter?
- If you have time to consolidate information then it is much less susceptible to interference. Specifically it protects from retroactive interference
- Retroactive Interference
- The new things that you learn interfere with the old things that you learned
- Proactive Interference
- The old things that you learned can interfere with consolidation of new information
- We Never Forget
- Another theory is that nothing is lost from LTM but this is not a falsifiable theory so it is not a very good theory
- Summary
- LTM is not infinite
- Forgetting happens along a curve
Tuesday, February 21, 2012
375: Remembering Events Pt 3
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
No comments:
Post a Comment
Your writing a comment!!! I love you now.